A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF FIVE NEAR-SYNONYMOUS ARABIC VERBS: JA’A, ATA, AQBAL, HADARA AND QADIMA

https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-5-0078 Muhammadnosirxon ABDUVOSIYEV a

a 2nd-year Master’s degree student at Yangi Asr University. E-mail: xomidov108@gmail.com A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF FIVE NEAR-SYNONYMOUS ARABIC VERBS:

JA’A, ATA, AQBAL, HADARA AND QADIMA Abstract. The Arabic language is renowned for its lexical richness, particularly in the domain of near-synonyms (ةيوغللا قورفلا). This paper examines the semantic distinctions among five Arabic verbs that are commonly translated as «to come» in English: jaʼa (ءاج), ata (ىتأ), aqbala (لبقأ), ḥaḍara (رضح), and qadima (مدق). Drawing upon classical Arabic lexicography, Qurʼanic usage, and modern linguistic scholarship, the study employs a comparative analytical method to identify the distinctive semantic features, pragmatic contexts, and stylistic nuances of each verb. The findings reveal that despite their apparent synonymy, each verb carries unique connotations related to manner, purpose, distance, formality, and aspectual perspective. The study contributes to the field of Arabic lexical semantics and has implications for Qurʼanic exegesis, Arabic language pedagogy, and translation studies.

Keywords: Arabic near-synonyms, lexical semantics, verbs of motion, furuq lughawiyya, Qurʼanic vocabulary, Arabic linguistics.

INTRODUCTION One of the most remarkable features of the Arabic language is its extraordinary lexical precision. Classical Arab linguists devoted entire treatises to the study of semantic differences among apparently synonymous words, a discipline known as ilm al-furuq al-lughawiyya (ةيوغللا قورفلا ملع). Abu Hilal al-ʼAskari (d. 395/1005), in his seminal work al-Furuq al-Lughawiyya, established the foundational principle that true synonymy is rare in Arabic and that apparent synonyms invariably possess distinguishing nuances (al-ʼAskari, 1997:15). This principle is echoed by Ibn Faris (d. 395/1004), who argued that every Arabic root carries a core semantic nucleus from which all its derivatives branch out (Ibn Faris, 1979:7).

Vol. 5, (Issue 2/2026) MAIN PART The semantic field of «coming» or «arriving» in Arabic is particularly rich. While English primarily relies on a single verb «to come» Arabic possesses at least five distinct verbs that cover this semantic territory: jaʼa, ata, aqbala, ḥaḍara, and qadima. Each of these verbs, despite sharing the general semantic feature of [+movement toward a destination], encodes different nuances regarding manner, purpose, distance, social register, and aspectual perspective.

The significance of these distinctions extends beyond theoretical linguistics. In Qurʼanic exegesis (tafsir), the precise choice of verb is considered part of the inimitable rhetorical miracle (iʼjaz) of the Qurʼan. Al-Raghib al-Isfahani (d. 502/1108), in his al- Mufradat fi Gharib al-Qurʼan, meticulously catalogued the subtle meanings of Qurʼanic vocabulary, demonstrating that word choice in the Qurʼan is never arbitrary (al-Isfahani, 2009:1/5). Similarly, al-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1144) in al-Kashshaf frequently analyzed the rhetorical reasons behind the selection of specific verbs in Qurʼanic discourse (al-Zamakhshari, 1998:37).

Modern Arabic linguistic scholarship has continued this tradition. Tammam Hassan, in his influential al-Lugha al-ʼArabiyya: Maʼnaha wa Mabnaha, emphasized the importance of contextual analysis in determining the precise meaning of Arabic words (Hassan, 1994:335). Faḍil al-Samarraʼi, in his works on Qurʼanic expression, demonstrated how the Qurʼan’s choice between near-synonymous verbs serves specific rhetorical and semantic purposes (al-Samarraʼi, 2003:29).

The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic comparative analysis of the five Arabic verbs of coming jaʼa, ata, aqbala, ḥaḍara, and qadima identifying their distinctive semantic features, pragmatic conditions, and stylistic implications. The study aims to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the core semantic distinctions among these five verbs? (2) How do classical and modern Arab scholars characterize these differences? (3) What are the contextual and pragmatic factors governing the selection of each verb?

METHODOLOGY This study employs a comparative analytical method (نراقلما يليلحتلا جهنلما) drawing upon three categories of sources:

Classical lexicographic sources constitute the primary foundation. These include: Ibn Manẓur’s (d. 711/1311) Lisan al-ʼArab, the most comprehensive classical Arabic dictionary (Ibn Manẓur, 1993); al-Fayruzabadi’s (d. 817/1415) al-Qamus al-Muḥiţ (al- Fayruzabadi, 2005); al-Zamakhshari’s (d. 538/1144) Asas al-Balagha (al-Zamakhshari, 1998b); and Abu Hilal al-ʼAskari’s al-Furuq al-Lughawiyya (al-ʼAskari, 1997). Al-Raghib al-Isfahani’s al-Mufradat (al-Isfahani, 2009) was used as a primary source for Qurʼanic lexical analysis.

Exegetical works (tafsir) were consulted to examine how these verbs function in Qurʼanic discourse. Key sources include al-Ţabari’s (d. 310/923) Jamiʼ al-Bayan (al- Ţabari, 2000), al-Zamakhshari’s al-Kashshaf (al-Zamakhshari, 1998), and Ibn ʼAshur’s (d. 1393/1973) al-Taḥrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn ʼAshur, 1984). Modern linguistic studies provide the theoretical framework. These include Tammam Hassan’s structural-contextual approach (Hassan, 1994), Faḍil al-Samarraʼi’s studies on Qurʼanic semantics (al-Samarraʼi, 2003), and Ibrahim Anis’s foundational study on near-synonymy Fi al-Lahajat al-ʼArabiyya (Anis, 2003). Western linguistic frameworks of lexical semantics, particularly componential analysis and prototype theory (Cruse, 1986), were also applied where relevant.

The analytical procedure involved: (1) collecting the lexical entries for each verb from classical dictionaries; (2) identifying and cataloguing Qurʼanic attestations of each verb using concordance tools; (3) examining how exegetes and linguists characterized the distinctions; and (4) synthesizing the findings into a comparative semantic framework with distinctive features for each verb.

RESULTS Jaʼa (ءاج): The Unmarked Verb of Coming The verb jaʼa (ءاج) represents the most semantically neutral and frequently used verb of coming in Arabic. Ibn Manẓur defines it simply as the antonym of dhahaba («to go»): it denotes arrival at a place without specifying manner, purpose, or distance (Ibn Manẓur, 1993:1/45). Al-ʼAskari characterizes jaʼa as the most general (aʼamm) of all verbs denoting arrival, noting that it can be used for both physical and abstract coming (al-ʼAskari, 1997:164).

In the Qurʼan, jaʼa and its derivatives appear over 270 times, making it by far the most frequent verb of coming in the sacred text. It is used for a wide range of subjects:

Vol. 5, (Issue 2/2026) human beings, angels, divine punishment, truth, falsehood, night, and abstract concepts. For instance, in Surat al-Israʼ (17:81): لطابلا قهزو قلحا ءاج («Truth has come, and falsehood has departed»). Al-Isfahani notes that jaʼa in the Qurʼan is used both transitively and intransitively and covers the widest semantic range among arrival verbs (al-Isfahani, 2009:199).

Al-Samarraʼi observes that jaʼa is typically used in Qurʼanic contexts involving momentous events, solemn occasions, and situations carrying a sense of gravity or weight. He notes that when the Qurʼan describes the arrival of something significant truth, divine command, or a decisive moment it tends to favor jaʼa (al-Samarraʼi, 2003:84). Ata (ىتأ): Purposeful and Facilitated Coming The verb ata (ىتأ) shares significant semantic overlap with jaʼa but possesses distinctive nuances. Al-ʼAskari identifies a key difference: while jaʼa denotes mere arrival, ata often implies coming with ease, compliance, or a specific purpose (al-ʼAskari, 1997:165). Ibn Manẓur adds that ata frequently carries the connotation of bringing something along or fulfilling an objective (Ibn Manẓur, 1993:17).

In Qurʼanic usage, ata appears approximately 260 times. Al-Isfahani observes that ata in the Qurʼan often emphasizes the ease or smoothness of approach, as opposed to the weightier arrival implied by jaʼa (al-Isfahani, 2009:58). A notable example is Surat Ţa-Ha (20:69): ىتأ ثيح رحاسلا حلفي لاو («...and the magician will not succeed wherever he goes»), where ata emphasizes deliberate, purposeful movement. A particularly illuminating example of the distinction between jaʼa and ata is found in the story of Prophet Musa. Al-Samarraʼi demonstrates that the Qurʼan consistently uses ata when Musa approaches the fire willingly and with expectation, while jaʼa is used when describing external events arriving upon someone (al-Samarraʼi, 2003:87). Tammam Hassan confirms that the transitivity pattern of ata frequently taking a prepositional complement with bi- («with») reinforces its semantic feature of purposeful or productive arrival (Hassan, 1994:341).

Aqbala (لبقأ): Approaching with Visible Orientation The verb aqbala (لبقأ), derived from the root q-b-l meaning «facing» or «turning toward,» carries a distinctive aspectual nuance. Unlike jaʼa and ata, which typically denote completed arrival, aqbala emphasizes the process of approaching the subject is visibly advancing toward the speaker or a reference point. Ibn Manẓur defines it as turning one’s face toward something and advancing in its direction (Ibn Manẓur, 1993:536).

Al-ʼAskari distinguishes aqbala from the other verbs of coming by its inceptiveprogressive aspect: it marks the beginning and continuation of the approach rather than its completion (al-ʼAskari, 1997:167). The visual dimension is essential aqbala implies that the observer can see the subject coming from a distance. Al-Isfahani notes that in the Qurʼan, aqbala is used to create vivid, cinematic imagery of approach, as in Surat al-Ṣaffat (37:27): نولءاستي ضعب ىلع مهضعب لبقأو («And they will approach one another, questioning each other»), where the verb captures the gradual turning and advancing toward one another (al-Isfahani, 2009:390).

Al-Samarraʼi emphasizes that aqbala in the Qurʼan is frequently associated with physical directionality and face-to-face encounter, distinguishing it from the more resultoriented jaʼa (al-Samarraʼi, 2003:91). Anis corroborates this analysis, noting that aqbala belongs to a class of Arabic verbs where the Form IV pattern (afʼala) adds an inchoativedirectional nuance to the base meaning (Anis, 2003:156). Ḥaḍara (رضح): Attendance and Formal Presence The verb ḥaḍara (رضح) occupies a semantically distinct position from the other four verbs. Its primary meaning is not merely «to come» but rather «to be present, to attend.» Ibn Manẓur defines it as the antonym of ghaba («to be absent»), emphasizing the state of being at a place rather than the motion of arriving there (Ibn Manẓur, 1993:4/188). Al- Fayruzabadi similarly glosses it as being present at an assembly or event (al-Fayruzabadi, 2005:391).

Al-ʼAskari draws a critical distinction: while jaʼa focuses on the act of coming and ata on purposeful arrival, ḥaḍara foregrounds the result of coming the state of being present and participating (al-ʼAskari, 1997:198). In modern linguistic terms, ḥaḍara is a stative-resultative verb that profiles the endpoint rather than the trajectory of motion. This is reflected in its typical collocations: one says ḥaḍara al-dars («attended the lesson»), ḥaḍara al-majlis («attended the council»), ḥaḍara al-ḥafl («attended the ceremony»). In the Qurʼan, ḥaḍara and its derivatives appear in contexts emphasizing witnessing, attendance, and formal presence. For example, in Surat al-Baqara (2:133): ءادهش متنك مأ تولما بوقعي رضح ذإ («Or were you witnesses when death approached Yaʼqub?»), ḥaḍara conveys the solemn sense of death being present as a witnessed event (al-Ţabari, 2000:2/574). Ibn ʼAshur comments that ḥaḍara was selected here precisely because it emphasizes presence and witnessing rather than mere arrival (Ibn ʼAshur, 1984:1/741).

Vol. 5, (Issue 2/2026) Qadima (مدق): Arrival from a Journey with Honor The verb qadima (مدق) denotes coming from a distant place, typically after a journey, and carries connotations of honor, dignity, and formal reception. Ibn Manẓur explicitly links it to arrival from travel (qudum min al-safar), distinguishing it from the more general jaʼa (Ibn Manẓur, 1993:12/466). Al-Fayruzabadi adds that it implies honor and elevation in the manner of arrival (al-Fayruzabadi, 2005:1044). Al-ʼAskari characterizes qadima as carrying an inherent semantic feature of [+distance] and [+honor]: the subject has traversed a considerable distance and the arrival is noteworthy, often welcomed or anticipated (al-ʼAskari, 1997:375). This is reflected in the Arabic tradition of using expressions like qadima al-ḍuyuf («the guests arrived») and qadima min al-madina («he arrived from the city»), which imply a respectful welcome. In the Qurʼan, the root q-d-m appears in several forms. A notable verbal usage is in Surat Hud (11:98): رانلا مهدروأف ةمايقلا موي هموق مدقي («He will precede his people on the Day of Resurrection and lead them into the Fire»), where the notion of leading and arriving first is combined with the verb’s directional semantics. Al-Isfahani observes that qadima in its various forms consistently implies priority, precedence, and dignified approach (al-Isfahani, 2009:659). Al-Samarraʼi notes that in everyday Arabic, qadima is almost exclusively used for long-distance arrivals and formal receptions, never for casual or routine coming (al-Samarraʼi, 2003:96).

Comparative Semantic Matrix The following table synthesizes the distinctive semantic features of the five verbs based on the analysis above:

Feature jaʼa ata aqbala ḥaḍaraqadima Arabic ءاج ىتأ لبقأ رضح مدق Core meaning General coming Purposeful coming Approaching visibly Being present / attending Arriving from afar Distance Any Any From a visible distance IrrelevantLong distance PurposeUnmarked+Purpose / +Result Unmarked +Participation+Honor / +Reception

AspectPerfectivePerfectiveInceptiveprogressive Stativeresultative Perfective RegisterNeutralNeutralLiterary / VividFormal / Official Honorific / Formal Table 1. Comparative semantic features of five Arabic verbs of coming. DISCUSSION Theoretical Implications The findings of this study support the classical Arabic linguistic principle articulated by al-ʼAskari and Ibn Faris that true synonymy is exceedingly rare in Arabic. The five verbs examined, while sharing the general semantic domain of [+coming], each encode a unique configuration of semantic features relating to manner, purpose, aspect, distance, and social register. This aligns with the componential analysis approach in modern lexical semantics (Cruse, 1986:265), which holds that near-synonyms are distinguished by subtle but systematic differences in their semantic components. The distinction between jaʼa (unmarked, general) and ata (marked for purpose and ease) is particularly significant for Qurʼanic studies. As al-Samarraʼi demonstrated, the Qurʼan’s selection between these two verbs is never random but serves precise rhetorical purposes (al-Samarraʼi, 2003:88). This finding reinforces the broader principle of Qurʼanic iʼjaz (inimitability) that every lexical choice in the Qurʼan is deliberate and meaningful.

The case of aqbala is particularly interesting from a linguistic typology perspective. Its inceptive-progressive aspectual profile sets it apart from the other four verbs, all of which default to a perfective reading. This demonstrates that Arabic verbs of motion can encode not only path, manner, and goal the parameters identified in Talmy’s (2000) motion event typology but also aspectual perspective on the event. The morphological pattern of Form IV (afʼala) contributes this aspectual nuance, as Anis has observed (Anis, 2003:158).

Implications for Translation and Pedagogy The semantic richness documented in this study poses significant challenges for translation. Translating all five verbs as «to come» in English as is common in both literary and religious translation results in a substantial loss of meaning. A more precise

Vol. 5, (Issue 2/2026) translation practice would render jaʼa as «came,» ata as «came (with/for),» aqbala as «approached» or «advanced,» ḥaḍara as «attended» or «was present at,» and qadima as «arrived (from a journey)» or «graced (an occasion).» Hassan’s contextual approach to Arabic semantics provides a valuable framework for translators navigating such distinctions (Hassan, 1994:347).

For Arabic language pedagogy, the findings suggest that teaching near-synonymous verbs in isolation as discrete vocabulary items is insufficient. Students benefit from contrastive presentation that highlights the distinctive features of each verb, ideally illustrated with Qurʼanic and literary examples. This approach aligns with the semantic field method advocated by modern applied linguists for vocabulary instruction (Nation, 2001:56).

Limitations and Future Directions This study has several limitations. First, it focused on the five most common verbs of coming and did not examine less frequent near-synonyms such as wafada (وفد), which also carries connotations of honorable arrival. Second, the analysis was primarily based on classical sources and Qurʼanic usage; a corpus-based study of modern Arabic texts would complement these findings. Third, dialectal variation how these verbs are used differently across Arabic dialects was beyond the scope of this study. Future research could profitably address these gaps, as well as extending the analysis to other semantic fields (e.g., verbs of seeing, verbs of knowing) where Arabic displays similar lexical richness.

CONCLUSION This study has demonstrated that the five Arabic verbs of coming jaʼa, ata, aqbala, ḥaḍara, and qadima are not interchangeable synonyms but rather form a structured semantic network, each encoding unique features of manner, purpose, aspect, distance, and register. Jaʼa serves as the unmarked, general verb of coming; ata adds the dimension of purpose and facilitated approach; aqbala profiles the visible, ongoing process of approaching; ḥaḍara foregrounds the resultant state of presence and formal attendance; and qadima encodes long-distance travel with connotations of honor and dignified reception.

These findings validate the classical Arabic linguistic tradition that regarded nearsynonymy as a source of expressive richness rather than redundancy. The precise deployment of these verbs in the Qurʼan exemplifies the principle of lexical precision that classical scholars identified as a hallmark of eloquent Arabic. For modern scholarship, translation practice, and language pedagogy, a nuanced understanding of these distinctions is essential for accurate interpretation and faithful rendering of Arabic texts. REFERENCES 1. Classical Arabic Sources 2. al-ʼAskari, Abu Hilal al-Ḥasan ibn ʼAbd Allah. (1997). al-Furuq al-lughawiyya [ةيوغللا قورفلا] (M. I. Salim, Ed.). Cairo: Dar al-ʼIḷm wa al-Thaqafa.

3. al-Fayruzabadi, Muhammad ibn Yaʼqub. (2005). al-Qamus al-muhiṭ [طيلمحا سوماقلا] (M. N. al-ʼIrqsusi, Ed.). Beirut: Muʽassasat al-Risala.

4. al-Isfahani, al-Raghib. (2009). al-Mufradat fi gharib al-Qurʼan [نآرقلا بيرغ في تادرفلما] (Ṣ. ʼA. al-Dawudi, Ed.). Damascus: Dar al-Qalam.

5. al-Ţabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir. (2000). Jamiʼ al-bayan ʼan taʼwil ay al-Qurʼan [نايبلا عماج نآرقلا يآ ليوتأ نع] (A. M. Shakir, Ed.). Cairo: Muʽassasat al-Risala. 6. al-Zamakhshari, Mahmud ibn ʼUmar. (1998). al-Kashshaf ʼan haqaʽiq ghawamid al-tanzil [ليزنتلا ضماوغ قئاقح نع فاشكلا] (Vols. 1–4). Riyadh: Maktabat al-ʼUbaykan. 7. al-Zamakhshari, Mahmud ibn ʼUmar. (1998b). Asas al-balagha [ةغلابلا ساسأ]. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʼIlmiyya.

8. Ibn ʼAshur, Muhammad al-Ţahir. (1984). al-Tahrir wa al-tanwir [ريونتلاو ريرحتلا] (Vols. 1–30). Tunis: al-Dar al-Tunisiyya li-l-Nashr.

9. Ibn Faris, Ahmad. (1979). Muʼjam maqayis al-lugha [ةغللا سيياقم مجعم] (ʼA. M. Harun, Ed., Vols. 1–6). Cairo: Dar al-Fikr.

10. Ibn Manẓur, Muhammad ibn Mukarram. (1993). Lisan al-ʼArab [برعلا ناسل] (Vols. 1–15, 3rd ed.). Beirut: Dar Ṣadir.

11.

12. Anis, Ibrahim. (2003). Fi al-lahajat al-ʼArabiyya [8( ]ةيبرعلا تاجهللا فيth ed.). Cairo: Maktabat al-Anjilu al-Miṣriyya.

13. Hassan, Tammam. (1994). al-Lugha al-ʼArabiyya: Maʼnaha wa mabnaha [اهانعم :ةيبرعلا ةغللا 3( ]اهانبموrd ed.). Cairo: ʼAlam al-Kutub.

14. al-Samarraʼi, Faḍil Ṣalih. (2003). Maʼani al-naḥw [وحنلا نياعم] (Vols. 1–4). Amman: Dar al- Fikr.

15. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 16. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.